ProcedureRadar vs Turquoise Health
The short answer
ProcedureRadar and Turquoise Health both pull hospital prices from federally mandated transparency files. Turquoise is built for large health systems and national payers, enterprise sales only, no published pricing. ProcedureRadar is self-serve from $799/mo, built for mid-market MGAs, TPAs, and specialty payers who need statistical depth without a six-figure procurement.
The Honest Verdict
Choose Turquoise Health if you're a large health system, national payer, or pharma team that needs payer-negotiated TiC rates, contract intelligence, and enterprise implementation support, and your organization can move a six-figure deal.
Choose ProcedureRadar if you're a mid-size MGA, TPA, specialty payer, or early-stage insurtech that needs underwriting-grade hospital MRF data with verified statistical depth, self-serve API access, and a price you can approve on a corporate card.
Side by Side
| Dimension | ProcedureRadar | Turquoise Health |
|---|---|---|
| Entry price / how you buy | $799/mo, self-serve monthly subscription; no sales call required✓ Best | Enterprise, sales-led; pricing is customized per organization and not publicly listed; a sales contact is required for all tiersSource as of 2026-07-03 |
| Data breadth / coverage | Top 100 US metros, 2,000+ priced hospitals | National coverage across hospital MRF and payer TiC data sources; 78 billion price records as of their 2022 year-in-review; scale has grown since 2022 (current figure not publicly itemized)✓ BestSource as of 2026-07-03 |
| Payer-negotiated rates (TiC) | On roadmap; not yet ingested | Offered; in-network negotiated rate files and allowed amounts files from TiC-mandated payers are ingested and served through the platform✓ BestSource as of 2026-07-03 |
| Hospital MRF pricing | 15,000,000+ records sourced from federally mandated hospital MRFs; per-record source attribution | Hospital MRF data from thousands of hospitals under the Hospital Price Transparency Final Rule; includes gross charges, negotiated rates, cash prices, and de-identified min/max negotiated chargesSource as of 2026-07-03 |
| Severity distributions and confidence intervals | Verified-cohort severity distributions (p25, p75, p95, p99) with BCa confidence intervals✓ Best | No publicly documented statistical depth such as severity distributions or confidence intervals found in public product materials; platform is focused on rate comparison, contract intelligence, and complianceSource as of 2026-07-03 |
| Statistical transparency | Public methodology white-paper at /methodology/whitepaper; downloadable verified data sample at /data✓ Best | Data quality and methodology are described qualitatively for enterprise customers; no public methodology white-paper or downloadable verified data sample found in public materialsSource as of 2026-07-03 |
| Developer experience | Self-serve API from $799/mo; OpenAPI documentation; instant key provisioning✓ Best | API access is available for downstream data delivery; no self-serve developer portal or public API documentation found; access requires enterprise sales engagementSource as of 2026-07-03 |
| Data provenance | Federal MRF per 45 CFR Part 180; per-record source attribution back to originating hospital file | Data sourced from both the Hospital Price Transparency Final Rule and the Transparency in Coverage (TiC) Final Rule; federal mandate-driven provenance for both hospital and payer rate filesSource as of 2026-07-03 |
Competitor cells link to the public source they are drawn from, with the date we last checked it.
What the Differences Mean
How You Buy: Self-Serve vs Enterprise Sales
Coverage: Where Turquoise Is Bigger
Statistical Depth: Where We Go Deeper
Provenance and Verification
Payer-Negotiated Rates: An Honest Gap
Why You Can Trust These Numbers
Every ProcedureRadar figure on this page comes from federally mandated hospital Machine-Readable Files published under 45 CFR Part 180, the Hospital Price Transparency Rule. We track pricing across the top 100 US metros and have published prices from 2,000+ hospitals, built from 15,000,000+ pricing records with per-record source attribution.
- Read the full methodology white-paper for every modeling choice and limitation.
- Download a verified data sample and audit the fields before you commit.
- See how we source and validate data on our methodology page.
- Review our pricing tiers and what is included at each access level.
- Browse the developer portal for API documentation and integration guides.
Founder of ProcedureRadar, former NFL running back (Philadelphia Eagles, Minnesota Vikings), former offensive assistant coach (New York Giants), corporate finance and technology entrepreneur, Villanova University alumnus.
Reviewed by Kevin Monangai on .
When I compare ProcedureRadar to another pricing platform, I try to be straight about what each product actually does. The big enterprise data companies are genuinely good. They're built for buyers who can move a six-figure procurement, which rules out most mid-market MGAs, TPAs, and specialty payers. We built ProcedureRadar for those teams. Underwriting-grade data, at a price they can approve in a 30-minute call.
Frequently Asked Questions
- How does Turquoise Health coverage compare to ProcedureRadar?
- Turquoise Health operates at national scale with hospital MRF data plus payer-negotiated TiC rates from hundreds of payers. ProcedureRadar covers the top 100 US metros and 2,000+ priced hospitals. If you need full national reach or payer-negotiated rates today, Turquoise has more breadth. Where ProcedureRadar goes deeper is statistical rigor: verified-cohort severity distributions (p25 through p99) with BCa confidence intervals that Turquoise public materials do not document.
- Does Turquoise Health have payer-negotiated rates? Does ProcedureRadar?
- Turquoise Health ingests payer Transparency in Coverage (TiC) machine-readable files alongside hospital MRFs, which means they serve payer-negotiated contract rates today. ProcedureRadar currently serves hospital MRF data only; payer-negotiated TiC rates are on our roadmap, not yet shipped.
- How do I get access to Turquoise Health versus ProcedureRadar?
- Turquoise Health is enterprise and sales-led. You contact their team for a custom quote and implementation scope; no pricing is listed anywhere on their site. ProcedureRadar is a self-serve API subscription starting at $799/mo, with instant key provisioning and no sales call required.
- How current is each platform data?
- Turquoise Health ingests payer MRF data monthly and hospital data as hospitals publish updated files. ProcedureRadar re-ingests hospital MRFs on a rolling monthly pipeline. Both platforms pull from the same upstream federal mandate, the rules requiring hospitals and payers to publish machine-readable pricing files.
- Why trust ProcedureRadar data if Turquoise is a larger platform?
- ProcedureRadar sources exclusively from federally mandated hospital MRFs under 45 CFR Part 180 and attributes every record back to the originating hospital file. We publish a public methodology white-paper and a downloadable verified data sample so you can audit what you're buying before you commit. Turquoise covers more ground nationally. We cover the top 100 US metros with documented statistical rigor: severity distributions, BCa confidence intervals, and source attribution on every record.
See the Data for Yourself
Walk through coverage, statistical depth, and API access on a quick call, or provision a key and start pulling data today.
Pricing data cited in this comparison is sourced from federally mandated hospital Machine-Readable Files. Competitor facts are drawn from publicly available materials including each company's own published documentation.
Pricing disclosure required by 45 CFR Part 180.
- Turquoise Health public materials (July 3, 2026)
- ProcedureRadar Methodology (July 3, 2026)
Last updated: